drm/i915/selftests: tweak the misaligned_case
The compact-pt layout restrictions should only apply to the ppGTT. Also make this play nice on platforms that only have the 64K GTT restriction, and not the compact-pt thing. Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220420181613.70033-4-matthew.auld@intel.com
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1112,10 +1112,16 @@ static int misaligned_case(struct i915_address_space *vm, struct intel_memory_re
|
||||
expected_vma_size = round_up(size, 1 << (ffs(vma->resource->page_sizes_gtt) - 1));
|
||||
expected_node_size = expected_vma_size;
|
||||
|
||||
if (NEEDS_COMPACT_PT(vm->i915) && i915_gem_object_is_lmem(obj)) {
|
||||
/* compact-pt should expand lmem node to 2MB */
|
||||
if (HAS_64K_PAGES(vm->i915) && i915_gem_object_is_lmem(obj)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The compact-pt should expand lmem node to 2MB for the ppGTT,
|
||||
* for all other cases we should only expect 64K.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
expected_vma_size = round_up(size, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_64K);
|
||||
expected_node_size = round_up(size, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_2M);
|
||||
if (NEEDS_COMPACT_PT(vm->i915) && !i915_is_ggtt(vm))
|
||||
expected_node_size = round_up(size, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_2M);
|
||||
else
|
||||
expected_node_size = round_up(size, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_64K);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (vma->size != expected_vma_size || vma->node.size != expected_node_size) {
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user