iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Fix iommu_device_probe bug due to duplicated stream ids

[ Upstream commit b00d24997a11c10d3e420614f0873b83ce358a34 ]

ASPEED VGA card has two built-in devices:
 0008:06:00.0 PCI bridge: ASPEED Technology, Inc. AST1150 PCI-to-PCI Bridge (rev 06)
 0008:07:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ASPEED Technology, Inc. ASPEED Graphics Family (rev 52)

Its toplogy looks like this:
 +-[0008:00]---00.0-[01-09]--+-00.0-[02-09]--+-00.0-[03]----00.0  Sandisk Corp Device 5017
                             |               +-01.0-[04]--
                             |               +-02.0-[05]----00.0  NVIDIA Corporation Device
                             |               +-03.0-[06-07]----00.0-[07]----00.0  ASPEED Technology, Inc. ASPEED Graphics Family
                             |               +-04.0-[08]----00.0  Renesas Technology Corp. uPD720201 USB 3.0 Host Controller
                             |               \-05.0-[09]----00.0  Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller
                             \-00.1  PMC-Sierra Inc. Device 4028

The IORT logic populaties two identical IDs into the fwspec->ids array via
DMA aliasing in iort_pci_iommu_init() called by pci_for_each_dma_alias().

Though the SMMU driver had been able to handle this situation since commit
563b5cbe33 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Cope with duplicated Stream IDs"), that
got broken by the later commit cdf315f907 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Maintain
a SID->device structure"), which ended up with allocating separate streams
with the same stuffing.

On a kernel prior to v6.15-rc1, there has been an overlooked warning:
  pci 0008:07:00.0: vgaarb: setting as boot VGA device
  pci 0008:07:00.0: vgaarb: bridge control possible
  pci 0008:07:00.0: vgaarb: VGA device added: decodes=io+mem,owns=none,locks=none
  pcieport 0008:06:00.0: Adding to iommu group 14
  ast 0008:07:00.0: stream 67328 already in tree   <===== WARNING
  ast 0008:07:00.0: enabling device (0002 -> 0003)
  ast 0008:07:00.0: Using default configuration
  ast 0008:07:00.0: AST 2600 detected
  ast 0008:07:00.0: [drm] Using analog VGA
  ast 0008:07:00.0: [drm] dram MCLK=396 Mhz type=1 bus_width=16
  [drm] Initialized ast 0.1.0 for 0008:07:00.0 on minor 0
  ast 0008:07:00.0: [drm] fb0: astdrmfb frame buffer device

With v6.15-rc, since the commit bcb81ac6ae3c ("iommu: Get DT/ACPI parsing
into the proper probe path"), the error returned with the warning is moved
to the SMMU device probe flow:
  arm_smmu_probe_device+0x15c/0x4c0
  __iommu_probe_device+0x150/0x4f8
  probe_iommu_group+0x44/0x80
  bus_for_each_dev+0x7c/0x100
  bus_iommu_probe+0x48/0x1a8
  iommu_device_register+0xb8/0x178
  arm_smmu_device_probe+0x1350/0x1db0
which then fails the entire SMMU driver probe:
  pci 0008:06:00.0: Adding to iommu group 21
  pci 0008:07:00.0: stream 67328 already in tree
  arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.9.auto: Failed to register iommu
  arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.9.auto: probe with driver arm-smmu-v3 failed with error -22

Since SMMU driver had been already expecting a potential duplicated Stream
ID in arm_smmu_install_ste_for_dev(), change the arm_smmu_insert_master()
routine to ignore a duplicated ID from the fwspec->sids array as well.

Note: this has been failing the iommu_device_probe() since 2021, although a
recent iommu commit in v6.15-rc1 that moves iommu_device_probe() started to
fail the SMMU driver probe. Since nobody has cared about DMA Alias support,
leave that as it was but fix the fundamental iommu_device_probe() breakage.

Fixes: cdf315f907 ("iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Maintain a SID->device structure")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250415185620.504299-1-nicolinc@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c

@@ -2597,6 +2597,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_insert_master(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
 	mutex_lock(&smmu->streams_mutex);
 	for (i = 0; i < fwspec->num_ids; i++) {
 		struct arm_smmu_stream *new_stream = &master->streams[i];
+		struct rb_node *existing;
 		u32 sid = fwspec->ids[i];
 
 		new_stream->id = sid;
@@ -2607,10 +2608,20 @@ static int arm_smmu_insert_master(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
 			break;
 
 		/* Insert into SID tree */
-		if (rb_find_add(&new_stream->node, &smmu->streams,
-				arm_smmu_streams_cmp_node)) {
-			dev_warn(master->dev, "stream %u already in tree\n",
-				 sid);
+		existing = rb_find_add(&new_stream->node, &smmu->streams,
+				       arm_smmu_streams_cmp_node);
+		if (existing) {
+			struct arm_smmu_master *existing_master =
+				rb_entry(existing, struct arm_smmu_stream, node)
+					->master;
+
+			/* Bridged PCI devices may end up with duplicated IDs */
+			if (existing_master == master)
+				continue;
+
+			dev_warn(master->dev,
+				 "stream %u already in tree from dev %s\n", sid,
+				 dev_name(existing_master->dev));
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 			break;
 		}