From 3bc5abf8e75a3d2cce8e0a1bfe2e4cb38df1a93a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Chao Yu Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 19:25:38 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: don't over-report free space or inodes in statvfs [ Upstream commit a9201960623287927bf5776de3f70fb2fbde7e02 ] This fixes an analogus bug that was fixed in modern filesystems: a) xfs in commit 4b8d867ca6e2 ("xfs: don't over-report free space or inodes in statvfs") b) ext4 in commit f87d3af74193 ("ext4: don't over-report free space or inodes in statvfs") where statfs can report misleading / incorrect information where project quota is enabled, and the free space is less than the remaining quota. This commit will resolve a test failure in generic/762 which tests for this bug. generic/762 - output mismatch (see /share/git/fstests/results//generic/762.out.bad) # --- tests/generic/762.out 2025-04-15 10:21:53.371067071 +0800 # +++ /share/git/fstests/results//generic/762.out.bad 2025-05-13 16:13:37.000000000 +0800 # @@ -6,8 +6,10 @@ # root blocks2 is in range # dir blocks2 is in range # root bavail2 is in range # -dir bavail2 is in range # +dir bavail2 has value of 1539066 # +dir bavail2 is NOT in range 304734.87 .. 310891.13 # root blocks3 is in range # ... # (Run 'diff -u /share/git/fstests/tests/generic/762.out /share/git/fstests/results//generic/762.out.bad' to see the entire diff) HINT: You _MAY_ be missing kernel fix: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX xfs: don't over-report free space or inodes in statvfs Cc: stable@kernel.org Fixes: ddc34e328d06 ("f2fs: introduce f2fs_statfs_project") Signed-off-by: Chao Yu Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/f2fs/super.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c index 702137eafaa6..b9913ab526fd 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c @@ -1774,26 +1774,32 @@ static int f2fs_statfs_project(struct super_block *sb, limit = min_not_zero(dquot->dq_dqb.dqb_bsoftlimit, dquot->dq_dqb.dqb_bhardlimit); - if (limit) - limit >>= sb->s_blocksize_bits; + limit >>= sb->s_blocksize_bits; + + if (limit) { + uint64_t remaining = 0; - if (limit && buf->f_blocks > limit) { curblock = (dquot->dq_dqb.dqb_curspace + dquot->dq_dqb.dqb_rsvspace) >> sb->s_blocksize_bits; - buf->f_blocks = limit; - buf->f_bfree = buf->f_bavail = - (buf->f_blocks > curblock) ? - (buf->f_blocks - curblock) : 0; + if (limit > curblock) + remaining = limit - curblock; + + buf->f_blocks = min(buf->f_blocks, limit); + buf->f_bfree = min(buf->f_bfree, remaining); + buf->f_bavail = min(buf->f_bavail, remaining); } limit = min_not_zero(dquot->dq_dqb.dqb_isoftlimit, dquot->dq_dqb.dqb_ihardlimit); - if (limit && buf->f_files > limit) { - buf->f_files = limit; - buf->f_ffree = - (buf->f_files > dquot->dq_dqb.dqb_curinodes) ? - (buf->f_files - dquot->dq_dqb.dqb_curinodes) : 0; + if (limit) { + uint64_t remaining = 0; + + if (limit > dquot->dq_dqb.dqb_curinodes) + remaining = limit - dquot->dq_dqb.dqb_curinodes; + + buf->f_files = min(buf->f_files, limit); + buf->f_ffree = min(buf->f_ffree, remaining); } spin_unlock(&dquot->dq_dqb_lock);