Merge branch 'percpu-for-linus' into percpu-for-next

Conflicts:
	arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c
	arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_counter.c
	arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c
	drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
	mm/percpu.c

Conflicts in core and arch percpu codes are mostly from commit
ed78e1e078dd44249f88b1dd8c76dafb39567161 which substituted many
num_possible_cpus() with nr_cpu_ids.  As for-next branch has moved all
the first chunk allocators into mm/percpu.c, the changes are moved
from arch code to mm/percpu.c.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Tejun Heo
2009-08-14 14:41:02 +09:00
1985 changed files with 49463 additions and 28163 deletions

View File

@@ -64,21 +64,20 @@ struct cpu_dbs_info_s {
unsigned int requested_freq;
int cpu;
unsigned int enable:1;
/*
* percpu mutex that serializes governor limit change with
* do_dbs_timer invocation. We do not want do_dbs_timer to run
* when user is changing the governor or limits.
*/
struct mutex timer_mutex;
};
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_dbs_info_s, cs_cpu_dbs_info);
static unsigned int dbs_enable; /* number of CPUs using this policy */
/*
* DEADLOCK ALERT! There is a ordering requirement between cpu_hotplug
* lock and dbs_mutex. cpu_hotplug lock should always be held before
* dbs_mutex. If any function that can potentially take cpu_hotplug lock
* (like __cpufreq_driver_target()) is being called with dbs_mutex taken, then
* cpu_hotplug lock should be taken before that. Note that cpu_hotplug lock
* is recursive for the same process. -Venki
* DEADLOCK ALERT! (2) : do_dbs_timer() must not take the dbs_mutex, because it
* would deadlock with cancel_delayed_work_sync(), which is needed for proper
* raceless workqueue teardown.
* dbs_mutex protects data in dbs_tuners_ins from concurrent changes on
* different CPUs. It protects dbs_enable in governor start/stop.
*/
static DEFINE_MUTEX(dbs_mutex);
@@ -488,18 +487,12 @@ static void do_dbs_timer(struct work_struct *work)
delay -= jiffies % delay;
if (lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu) < 0)
return;
if (!dbs_info->enable) {
unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
return;
}
mutex_lock(&dbs_info->timer_mutex);
dbs_check_cpu(dbs_info);
queue_delayed_work_on(cpu, kconservative_wq, &dbs_info->work, delay);
unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu);
mutex_unlock(&dbs_info->timer_mutex);
}
static inline void dbs_timer_init(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *dbs_info)
@@ -535,9 +528,6 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
if ((!cpu_online(cpu)) || (!policy->cur))
return -EINVAL;
if (this_dbs_info->enable) /* Already enabled */
break;
mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
rc = sysfs_create_group(&policy->kobj, &dbs_attr_group);
@@ -561,6 +551,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
this_dbs_info->down_skip = 0;
this_dbs_info->requested_freq = policy->cur;
mutex_init(&this_dbs_info->timer_mutex);
dbs_enable++;
/*
* Start the timerschedule work, when this governor
@@ -590,17 +581,19 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
&dbs_cpufreq_notifier_block,
CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
}
dbs_timer_init(this_dbs_info);
mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);
dbs_timer_init(this_dbs_info);
break;
case CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP:
mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
dbs_timer_exit(this_dbs_info);
mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
sysfs_remove_group(&policy->kobj, &dbs_attr_group);
dbs_enable--;
mutex_destroy(&this_dbs_info->timer_mutex);
/*
* Stop the timerschedule work, when this governor
@@ -616,7 +609,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
break;
case CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS:
mutex_lock(&dbs_mutex);
mutex_lock(&this_dbs_info->timer_mutex);
if (policy->max < this_dbs_info->cur_policy->cur)
__cpufreq_driver_target(
this_dbs_info->cur_policy,
@@ -625,7 +618,7 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_dbs(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
__cpufreq_driver_target(
this_dbs_info->cur_policy,
policy->min, CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
mutex_unlock(&dbs_mutex);
mutex_unlock(&this_dbs_info->timer_mutex);
break;
}