PCI: Fix lock symmetry in pci_slot_unlock()
commit f3efb9569b4a21354ef2caf7ab0608a3e14cc6e4 upstream. The commit a4e772898f8b ("PCI: Add missing bridge lock to pci_bus_lock()") made the lock function to call depend on dev->subordinate but left pci_slot_unlock() unmodified creating locking asymmetry compared with pci_slot_lock(). Because of the asymmetric lock handling, the same bridge device is unlocked twice. First pci_bus_unlock() unlocks bus->self and then pci_slot_unlock() will unconditionally unlock the same bridge device. Move pci_dev_unlock() inside an else branch to match the logic in pci_slot_lock(). Fixes: a4e772898f8b ("PCI: Add missing bridge lock to pci_bus_lock()") Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Reviewed-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250505115412.37628-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent
7f6a2d3784
commit
0b522796a8
@@ -5823,7 +5823,8 @@ static void pci_slot_unlock(struct pci_slot *slot)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (dev->subordinate)
|
||||
pci_bus_unlock(dev->subordinate);
|
||||
pci_dev_unlock(dev);
|
||||
else
|
||||
pci_dev_unlock(dev);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user